How to Read Sender and Receiver of Blockchain Bitcoin Transaction

btctousd81

i am trying to go bitcoin addresses from my blockchain stored on server. my bitcoin is upwardly to date. index mode is not enabled, as i dont want UTXO database. i tried using https://github.com/znort987/blockparser compiled it succesfully. strated like this [root@blockparser]# env BLOCKCHAIN_DIR="/home/user2/" ./parser allBalances > allBalances.txt info: mem at get-go = 0.000 Gigs info: starting command "allBalances" info: loading block concatenation from directory: /dwelling house/user2/.bitcoin info: block chain size = 136.344 Gigs info: initializing hash tables info: estimated number of blocks = 1071.27K info: estimated number of transactions = 276.71M info: washed initializing hash tables - mem = 0.000 Gigs info: laissez passer 1 -- walk all blocks and build headers ... info: pass 1 -- took 48 secs, 488497 blocks, 136.34 Gigs, 2862.34 Megs/secs , 89430 early on link misses, mem=0.000 Gigs info: pass 2 -- link all blocks ... info: pass 2 -- done, did 89430 late links info: pass 3 -- wire longest chain ... info: pass 3 -- done, maxHeight=488497 info: pass 4 -- full blockchain analysis (with index)... info: computing remainder for all addresses info: hit ^C to interrupt and dump current, valid state of ledger info:        1 blocks,    0.000 MegaAddrs , info:   141229 blocks,    one.738 MegaAddrs , info:   166873 blocks,    three.058 MegaAddrs , info:   181587 blocks,    3.939 MegaAddrs , info:   186771 blocks,    4.633 MegaAddrs , only information technology crashes in the middle., or some times at the end., i tried running it many times., previously i got retentivity related error., so freed upwards memory and increased swap on my server. then tried running it again correct now i am getting info: 481823 blocks, 295.351 MegaAddrs , fatal: failed to locate upstream transaction i counted and looks like it aborts when 2000 blocks are remaining. i am not the only one getting this error.. https://github.com/znort987/blockparser/issues/65 so what you guys are using ? to go data extracted from blockchain files. i take 64 gigs of ram, i7 , ssd . centos vii x64 is there whatsoever other tool ? optimized ? or any other fork thanks for your time,.

Advertised sites are non endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.

btctousd81

I can't help you lot set information technology, simply I tin can tell you the reason: blockparser is older than SegWit, then it stops at the cake in which SegWit got activated. BTC.COM mines the 481,823rd cake! Segwit is on phase! If y'all go it to work, I'd love to have a complete list (in for example CSV-format) of all addresses with their balance. I'd like to play around with it a scrap. i tin become a list earlier that cake by stopping programme., only i am looking for complete upto engagement listing. will post if i get information technology to work., what changed in segwit ? i mean in cake ? and so i can try to change information technology in blockparser source. edit i: this is the lawmaking cauing the fatal error         auto upTXHash = p;         const Chunk *upTX = 0;         if(gNeedUpstream && !skip) {             auto isGenTX = (0==memcmp(gNullHash.v, upTXHash, sizeof(gNullHash)));             if(likely(false==isGenTX)) {                 automobile i = gTXOMap.find(upTXHash);                 if(unlikely(gTXOMap.end()==i)) {                     errFatal("failed to locate upstream transaction");                 }                 upTX = i->second;             }         } i am not certain, will it give correct output. if i comment outt that line and recompile and rerun the code., volition try anyways.

amaclin1 Sr. Member Offline Activity: 686 Merit: 280	what inverse in segwit ? i hateful in block ? so i can try to modify it in blockparser source. Transaction format was changed in segwit. These six words mean that your tool should be fully rewritten.

btctousd81

what changed in segwit ? i mean in block ? then i can endeavor to alter information technology in blockparser source. Transaction format was inverse in segwit. These half dozen words mean that your tool should be fully rewritten. thanks and then looks similar i am better off trying with other tools., edit1 : i tried running it as it is, parsed around 50% blocks and got output file of 4 GB having format like this ---------------------------------------------------------------------------           Country of the ledger at block 420662 (minted : Thu Jul fourteen 08:eighteen:22 2016) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------               Residuum                      Hash160                             Base58                  nbIn        lastTimeIn          nbOut        lastTimeOut ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------          152955.81868182 e95dbb25283cc35d4a6aefa76c0382e63ce0fa36 3Nxwenay9Z8Lc9JBiywExpnEFiLp6Afp8v     56 Tue Jul 12 14:xi:34 2016      eleven Midweek Jun  1 xv:36:33 2016          121295.29280322 b3b9f5025c397c07e7e37db7e5c9259ac95cd344 3J5KeQSVBUEs3v2vEEkZDBtPLWqLTuZPuD    387 Thu Jul 14 05:00:27 2016     196 Sun Jul  iii 11:45:17 2016           83000.01001479 e1223ee403b7250d54c08890679df36e9d6b4986 3NDQz8rZ3CnmsiBGrATk8SCpDXF2sAUiuM      6 Lord's day Jul  3 15:23:05 2016       1 Sun May 29 01:58:14 2016           79957.11509537 a0b0d60e5991578ed37cbda2b17d8b2ce23ab295 1FeexV6bAHb8ybZjqQMjJrcCrHGW9sb6uF     85 Fri May 20 18:43:43 2016       0 Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970           78172.33497629 c5464169a9aabad0e361ccf1d436d3e843708e7d 3Kg7Cmooris7cLErTsijq6qR1FH3cTiK2G  20889 Dominicus Jul  3 fifteen:23:05 2016       4 Tue May 17 17:14:55 2016           69370.10525051 b3dd79fb3460c7b0d0bbb8d2ed93436b88b6d89c 1HQ3Go3ggs8pFnXuHVHRytPCq5fGG8Hbhx     64 Sat Feb thirteen 06:40:01 2016       i Thu Apr 23 14:10:25 2015           66650.59620465 3d03002dbed5cb1dc10fc6bcb0886d2df32f2838 16ZbpCEyVVdqu8VycWR8thUL2Rd9JnjzHt    168 Friday April 29 10:29:14 2016       0 Thu January  ane 00:00:00 1970           66583.22391617 cd4b7b8f9db1b0c709fd0c9f0534fca6a9f40495 1KiVwxEuGBYavyKrxkLncJt2pQ5YUUQX7f    120 Sat February thirteen 06:40:01 2016       0 Thu Jan  i 00:00:00 1970           66452.06624862 f9e6bbcdc83d8f351014e07495f386fe1067ec7b 1PnMfRF2enSZnR6JSexxBHuQnxG8Vo5FVK    114 Sat February 13 06:40:01 2016       0 Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970           66378.80961189 6a6015e3793207af6dff7c48ee9e193d73547cdc 1AhTjUMztCihiTyA4K6E3QEpobjWLwKhkR    181 Thu Feb 18 17:09:28 2016       0 Thu Jan  ane 00:00:00 1970           66235.82427687 8b70193546504fa3623598722575f70b5b1c6455 1DiHDQMPFu4p84rkLn6Majj2LCZZZRQUaa    125 Sabbatum Feb 13 06:xl:01 2016       0 Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970           66233.73850546 908b47d6a15d89c3ee34df1bc68a00ec4ff70c9b 1EBHA1ckUWzNKN7BMfDwGTx6GKEbADUozX    126 Sun Jun  5 18:31:03 2016       0 Thu Jan  i 00:00:00 1970           66205.47375047 27ed35ebcf72744ec3b4a0f4dbb83d7620acf443 14e7XAZbepQp9MXXzjNG3fNLoAUpaBAXHW    132 Fri Apr 29 10:29:xiv 2016       0 Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970           66170.69605917 f33a3af3695f041e2ea6271f1fe6309abac4dd58 1PB4xXUFyy4kSNqroCBVaQuCuw9VcN3be4    171 Friday Feb 12 04:57:18 2016       0 Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970           66163.44524020 53f9818e8d2d23c3163c01a33d83e49ebfa16ac4 18f1yugoAJuXcHAbsuRVLQC9TezJ6iVRLp    124 Midweek Mar  ix 23:07:42 2016       0 Thu January  1 00:00:00 1970           53880.05741758 d74de95f65799793f16b91ed8a152110652d3ec0 1LdRcdxfbSnmCYYNdeYpUnztiYzVfBEQeC     21 Fri February 12 04:57:18 2016       0 Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970           50700.00172304 ffd32592cc07d25a8644d7dfd6919d348f9b1874 3R1hBCHURkquAjFUv1eH5u2gXqooJkjg4B     81 Fri Jul  8 fourteen:53:10 2016      37 Sunday Jun 12 14:26:28 2016 after effectually 505 lines, btcaddress is screwed . 2500.00111000 a0fc91baff4e19cb9f417cef2f00d2822106b5be 1FgDgWjeCMxrfiiaYnPdvnQG9DcYe6yX1r      5 Thu April  ii 17:52:36 2015       0 Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970            2500.00111000 d34e8a9a7786fdbbff59be2a5cc169729b2bbae0 1LGHfdXMoAh3rAqfZ5tRruVxWz4drjLGHQ      5 Thu Apr  2 17:52:36 2015       0 Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970            2500.00111000 37a5e72afc3aa9ed12e51ee187c56a5d2e6f1ed9 165EuhCqScXdGJfDvYK5RZKN5SytnhwVjv      v Thu Apr  ii 17:52:36 2015       0 Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970            2500.00111000 a0b5712a79778cc923e3ca0a54a8a442d8c24a7c 1FekUWTJ4S4UTYuj41yaJCuntvh2cszhsk      5 Thu Apr  two 17:52:36 2015       0 Thu Jan  i 00:00:00 1970            2500.00111000 9519a19ef04031d40998d7a684c7878d4c5baa8e XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX      5 Thu Apr  two 17:52:36 2015       0 Thu January  i 00:00:00 1970            2500.00111000 51ccfe24e3577bb2b8f20ddf39ca69389dc3726c XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX      5 Thu Apr  2 17:52:36 2015       0 Thu Jan  one 00:00:00 1970            2500.00111000 9cfca6b08dc926b8903b58fde9c7d3db5f1b5007 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX      5 Thu Apr  2 17:52:36 2015       0 Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970            2500.00111000 43c43187cc1bf92fd25b62477a2d772a7db679b4 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX      5 Thu Apr  2 17:52:36 2015       0 Thu Jan  one 00:00:00 1970            2500.00005400 f90f808949b65ce2c01a0eacbf20febbf40b881e XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX      1 Tue Jun 21 03:52:29 2016       0 Thu Jan  one 00:00:00 1970            2500.00000000 6a7266721acf340b77f84d8d0f677171ae7bb8a6 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX      1 Wed Jun 29 22:52:52 2016       0 Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970            2500.00000000 b69398c2a4fe36e739ac765c4283d74323340afb XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX     thirteen Lord's day Mar  6 03:46:x 2016       half-dozen Mon Mar 28 01:11:36 2016            2500.00000000 86d1cc562153dd9954e31e9c7f3a02390b1d4a3f XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX      1 Fri Feb 19 21:51:14 2016       0 Thu Jan  one 00:00:00 1970            2500.00000000 2ac55d1a940deb5b5e684e500355f826b5381ee5 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX      i Friday Nov 27 thirteen:22:46 2015       0 Thu Jan  i 00:00:00 1970            2500.00000000 64dac2d7527f9967a2c0b6f18d986f116cd89bfd XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX      i Tue Jun 21 16:27:38 2016       0 Thu January  ane 00:00:00 1970            2499.99960000 f148343d37f0621eb00eef03ed191444ee8aaa30 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX      2 Friday Jul  8 13:16:16 2016       0 Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970            2499.99101000 74869025a6d4e202d1271b676ed5a374d92e94a2 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX     10 Thu Apr  2 17:52:36 2015       ane Tue Feb 11 17:17:54 2014            2499.97356500 a4bc600d905f4465dd59a4dfbdb740231036dc71 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX      7 Thu April  ii 17:52:36 2015       0 Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970            2497.99949660 1b490a2b5be46b6fd395c11ca0d6fd50f194fb7c XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX      1 Fri Oct 30 04:21:43 2015       0 Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970            2492.25031000 bc8d40e64b33e2d99ff81e4643dbf8d80e2a5c9b XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX      vii Thu April  2 17:52:36 2015       0 Thu Jan  ane 00:00:00 1970            2489.00121000 c8ca9fa680409b5d7375ad6d2fb5aac2e4405c89 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX      v Thu Apr  two 17:52:36 2015       0 Thu Jan  one 00:00:00 1970            2483.80277466 b8f27aaedf87530547e61406f73947455371e6de XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX      one Fri May 27 20:27:01 2016       0 Thu Jan  one 00:00:00 1970 so unless you desire hash160, or know how to convert hash160 to btcaddress., this tool is obsolete .

BitcoinPC

Waste of time, what is the point? It would take yous longer or almost the same amount of fourth dimension to steal coins this fashion than it would to mine Bitcoins using the same equipment. People have tried this fourth dimension and time again and the results are the aforementioned, they give up because it is a fruitless pursuit. In that location is always someone that thinks they know better than the organisation and they neglect in the end, so please try again.

btctousd81

Waste material of time, what is the point? Information technology would take you longer or most the same amount of time to steal coins this way than it would to mine Bitcoins using the aforementioned equipment. People take tried this time and fourth dimension once more and the results are the same, they give up because it is a fruitless pursuit. At that place is e'er someone that thinks they know better than the organisation and they fail in the end, and then delight attempt over again. what makes you think, my method is same every bit others., remember everyone is unique

bigvito19 Full Member Offline Activity: 668 Merit: 111	Is there any other mode to get hash160 addresses besides using this?

btctousd81	Is there whatsoever other fashion to get hash160 addresses besides using this? you want hash160 or btc address ?

bigvito19 Full Member Offline Activity: 668 Merit: 111	I take the btc addresses, I need a way to get the hash160 addresses.

btctousd81

I have the btc addresses, I demand a way to get the hash160 addresses. this is what i would apply . bool addrToHash160(           uint8_t *hash160,     const uint8_t *addr,              bool checkHash,              bool verbose ) {     static BIGNUM *sum = 0;     static BN_CTX *ctx = 0;     if(unlikely(!ctx)) {         ctx = BN_CTX_new();         BN_CTX_init(ctx);         sum = BN_new();     }     BN_zero(sum);     while(i) {         uint8_t c = *(addr++);         if(unlikely(0==c)) suspension;         uint8_t dg = fromB58Digit(c);         BN_mul_word(sum, 58);         BN_add_word(sum, dg);     }     uint8_t buf[4 + 2 + kRIPEMD160ByteSize + 4];     size_t size = BN_bn2mpi(sum, 0);     if(sizeof(buf)<size) {         warning(             "BN_bn2mpi returned weird buffer size %d, expected %d\n",             (int)size,             (int)sizeof(buf)         );         return false;     }     BN_bn2mpi(sum, buf);     uint32_t recordedSize =         (buf[0]<<24)    |         (buf[ane]<<sixteen)    |         (buf[2]<< 8)    |         (buf[3]<< 0)     ;     if(size!=(4+recordedSize)) {         alarm(             "BN_bn2mpi returned bignum size %d, expected %d\due north",             (int)recordedSize,             (int)size-iv         );         return false;     }     uint8_t *bigNumEnd;     uint8_t *dataEnd = size + buf;     uint8_t *bigNumStart = 4 + buf;     uint8_t *checkSumStart = bigNumEnd = (-4 + dataEnd);     while(0==bigNumStart[0] && bigNumStart<checkSumStart) ++bigNumStart;     ptrdiff_t bigNumSize = bigNumEnd - bigNumStart;     ptrdiff_t padSize = kRIPEMD160ByteSize - bigNumSize;     if(0<padSize) {         if(0<bigNumSize) {             memcpy(padSize + hash160, bigNumStart, bigNumSize);         }         memset(hash160, 0, padSize);     } else {         memcpy(hash160, bigNumStart - padSize, kRIPEMD160ByteSize);     }     bool hashOK = truthful;     if(checkHash) {         uint8_t information[1+kRIPEMD160ByteSize];         memcpy(1+information, hash160, kRIPEMD160ByteSize);         data[0] = getCoinType();         uint8_t sha[kSHA256ByteSize];         sha256Twice(sha, data, 1+kRIPEMD160ByteSize);         hashOK =             sha[0]==checkSumStart[0]  &&             sha[1]==checkSumStart[one]  &&             sha[two]==checkSumStart[2]  &&             sha[3]==checkSumStart[3];         if(!hashOK) {             alarm(                 "checksum of address %due south failed. Expected 0x%x%x%x%ten, got 0x%x%10%x%x.",                 addr,                 checkSumStart[0],                 checkSumStart[1],                 checkSumStart[2],                 checkSumStart[3],                 sha[0],                 sha[1],                 sha[2],                 sha[3]             );         }     }     render hashOK; } ref: https://github.com/znort987/blockparser/hulk/master/util.cpp#L596-L699

bigvito19 Full Member Offline Action: 668 Merit: 111	What would be the the steps or cmd line to use that? I've been trying to compile the parser simply having trouble with g++-4.4, what all did you install to get it to get it to work. I'm stuck at unable to locate the g++-4.four

btctousd81

What would be the the steps or cmd line to use that? I've been trying to compile the parser but having trouble with g++-4.4, what all did yous install to get information technology to get it to work. I'one thousand stuck at unable to locate the chiliad++-4.iv i do this for all my centos systems., yum install autoconf automake gcc-c++ libdb4-cxx libdb4-cxx-devel boost-devel openssl-devel but when mistake occures at the time of compiliing, act appropriately.

aplistir Full Fellow member Offline Activity: 379 Merit: 189

Waste of time, what is the point? It would take you longer or virtually the same amount of fourth dimension to steal coins this way than it would to mine Bitcoins using the same equipment. People have tried this fourth dimension and time again and the results are the same, they give up because it is a fruitless pursuit. In that location is e'er someone that thinks they know ameliorate than the arrangement and they neglect in the finish, so please try again. what makes yous call back, my method is same every bit others., remember anybody is unique So y'all admit yous are trying to steal bitcoins?  Skilful luck with that. I don't know, why y'all need to be able to parse the blockchain yourself though. Why not explore set made lists of bitcoin addresses. https://bitinfocharts.com/top-100-richest-bitcoin-addresses.html But yeah. many take tried and noticed bitcoin is more than secure than they thought. Would be interesting to know what is your angle of attack When reading your post I assumed y'all are just interested in the blockchain and exploring it out of interest. Considering I have been doing the same. there are some quite interesting addresses. Examples here: http://www.theopenledger.com/9-most-famous-bitcoin-addresses/

My Accost: 121f7zb2U4g9iM4MiJTDhEzqeZGHzq5wLh

btctousd81

Waste of time, what is the point? It would take you longer or near the same amount of time to steal coins this manner than it would to mine Bitcoins using the aforementioned equipment. People have tried this time and time again and the results are the same, they give up because it is a fruitless pursuit. There is e'er someone that thinks they know improve than the arrangement and they neglect in the end, so please endeavor once again. what makes you lot think, my method is same equally others., recall everyone is unique So you acknowledge you are trying to steal bitcoins?  Expert luck with that. I don't know, why you lot need to be able to parse the blockchain yourself though. Why not explore prepare made lists of bitcoin addresses. https://bitinfocharts.com/top-100-richest-bitcoin-addresses.html But aye. many take tried and noticed bitcoin is more secure than they thought. Would exist interesting to know what is your angle of attack When reading your post I assumed you are just interested in the blockchain and exploring information technology out of interest. Considering I have been doing the same. there are some quite interesting addresses. Examples here: http://world wide web.theopenledger.com/9-well-nigh-famous-bitcoin-addresses/ i thousand more of similar whitehat . i want make certain, if blockchain is secure enough, so that i can invest some big chunk of money in bitcoins.

btctousd81

i want make certain, if blockchain is secure enough Yous practise non have skills and knowledge for such checks ans assumptions i know, not all the same, simply i am trying/willing to learn. edit: 12th oct 2017 i take used blockaparser on 50% blocks. which gave me four gb allbalnce.txt file., i used 7zip to zip it., if anyone is intersted here it is., https://transfer.sh/DLIpD/blockparser-allBalances.txt.7z sick endeavour to parse the complete block when i go gratuitous fourth dimension., and try to go on this thread updated.

hamdi Hero Member Offline Activity: 826 Merit: 500	anybody had success above segwit blocks?

btctousd81

anybody had success above segwit blocks? using blockparser theoritically yes, practically no remove all blocks afterwards which segit is implemeted., remove bitcoind install bitcoin-core version bitcoin-core-0.xi.2 get-go bitcoind run blockparser over again else remove all blocks after which segit is implemeted., remove bitcoind install bitcoin-core version bitcoin-core-0.11.2 beginning bitcoind with resync run blockparser once again edit: practically no means i have not tried it still., only its the solution/correct mode to do information technology., thats what i have been told. ill effort information technology this week. adept luck

hamdi Hero Member Offline Activity: 826 Merit: 500	thanks a lot for replying!!!

cabanmotip1948.blogspot.com

Source: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2242310.0

Share this post